She is willing. Where can we have it?

I know she is willing. Both of us want to make love. I can’t take her home; she also can’t take me home. Any solution? A hotel room?

But, will the cops come and charge for Immoral Traffic? If so, we are finished.

Why we can’t have sex, if both are willing to have? The answer is simple. The cops may interfere and will play the game of cleaning the society by imposing the rules of “Immoral Traffic (Suppression) Act” beautifully and will lead to the court, may get punished, even if we never committed a crime.

The society will laugh on us, and she will get a new image “CALL GIRL” – “prostitute”. Why so?
I am sharing my worries here.

India has Immoral Traffic (Suppression) Act to control the prostitution related activities. But, it is being misused very effectively against the public.

Section 2 (f) of the act says “Prostitution means the act of a female offering her body for promiscuous sexual intercourse for hire, whether in money or in kind and whether offered immediately or otherwise and the expression prostitute will be construed accordingly”.

This means if money is not a matter here then it can’t be treated as prostitution. But the officials can produce a Rs/- 50 currency in the court and claim this as the main evidence. In my case, there is no money deal.

Article 2 says “Knowingly lets or rents a building or other place or any part thereof for the purpose of the prostitution of others”.

Here, I am not going to rent any building for the ‘purpose of the prostitution of others’. Even I am not intended to involve in any kind of prostitution activities. Then why?

Under Article 4, living on the earnings of prostitution is a crime.

Think about the couple, where wife is not earning. She is supposed to meet her expenses from the earnings of her husband. If they made sex, will the Government book a case against them for immoral traffic? Will the law call her “a prostitute”? So, all the wives whao are not an earning member will be trated as prostitutes ?

article 7 tells us as: "Any person who carries on prostitution and the person with whom such prostitution is carried in any premises…which are within a distance of two hundred meters of any place of public religious worship, educational institution, hostel, hospital, nursing home or such other public place of any kind…may be punishable”

So, by maintaining a distance of 201 meters from the above list, prostitution is not punishable? Interesting. And thank god, hotel is not in this list. (Convents also).

According to The Immoral Traffic (Suppression) Act, “prostitutes can practice their trade privately but cannot legally solicit customers in public. As long as it is done individually and voluntarily, a woman (male prostitution is not recognized in the Indian constitution) can use her body's attributes in exchange for material benefit. In particular, the law forbids a sex worker to carry on her profession within 200 meters of a public place”.

I haven’t heard about any campaign, which is promoting prostitution.

I am not rich; I am do not have influential contacts. Is that the reason for me to spend some time with a female in a hotel room? I think “yes” because,

“Rahul Gandhi was with Juvenitta, a Spnish girl, in Kumarakom hotel, in Kerala. (Indian Express January 3, 2005)”. And the cops provided all the security to them. It was moral, because, they were disusing about the nuclear deal. Rules are flexible and depends how it is being applied.

Good. I need to find a place which is 201 meters away from public and away from the cops.